<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] PIR's EPP DOMAIN INFO command change announcement
- To: "Jay Westerdal" <jwesterdal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] PIR's EPP DOMAIN INFO command change announcement
- From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 16:38:26 +1000
- Cc: <halloran@xxxxxxxxx>, <registrars@xxxxxxxx>, <bbeckwith@xxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcR7VtelqObzEd8WS2aTiOE6ul62zQAAjJhAACASU8AAgDYqsA==
- Thread-topic: [registrars] PIR's EPP DOMAIN INFO command change announcement
Hello Jay,
> But I digress, these fields may not be technically required
> but for practical purposes are necessary.
Yes - I was just pointing out that the EPP standard is not the issue
here (it is merely one of three access methods - the others being
port-43 WHOIS, and web based WHOIS), it is about what information should
be provided to whom (ie the central question being evaluated by the
WHOIS task forces).
Registrars are a class of user. A more useful discussion to have is
what data should registrars be able to access about domain names for
which they are not the registrar-of-record.
>
> Registry Status of a domain can only be found at the Registry level.
>
As I stated before, I agree that the status (ie whether it is active, on
lock etc) of the domain name should be available to all registrars, as
well as general Internet users. Ie I am OK with this piece of
information being in the category of information available by anonymous
access. Once you make this decision - then it is reasonable to request
that this information also be available to registrars via the EPP
protocol. The combined WHOIS task force 1/2 is considering this
question as part of considering the feasibility of tiered access.
Regards,
Bruce
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|