<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] .net thick/thin discussion
- To: Paul Stahura <stahura@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] .net thick/thin discussion
- From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:19:36 +0000
- Cc: "'Marcus Faure'" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Larry Erlich <erlich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, registrars@xxxxxxxx, brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: Message from Paul Stahura <stahura@enom.com> of "Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:13:16 MST." <DA6F8AFB015C544AB4385B5DEBDE1FBB0C2111@mail.enom.com>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Has anyone considered another alternative: depositing the whois at a common
> third party across all ICANN-contracted TLDs? Not the registries and not the
> registrars?
Paul,
The idea has occured to me. It gets the registry's hands off the IPC-mandated
data, and adds to the 3rd-party-escrows-or-drop-pools-or-validates-or-...
possibilities, which I think is desirable. We already see whois clients with
scoped expertise about the tld population, I don't see any reason why we
shouldn't also see whois servers with scoped authority about the gtld names.
Eric
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|