<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] 66% needed for approval
- To: "'Tim Ruiz'" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Rick Wesson'" <wessorh@xxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] 66% needed for approval
- From: "Bhavin Turakhia" <bhavin.t@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 20:48:50 +0530
- Cc: "'Monte Cahn'" <monte@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Rob Hall'" <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Jean-Michel Becar'" <jmbecar@xxxxxx>, "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <006b01c444bd$a434d4d0$fa05a8c0@TIMRUIZ>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcREvi6hQX7c4zbaTSSGjbIg0YoCYwACD58A
> Was the process perfect this year? No. Kurt admitted that
> himself. But the ICANN staff engaged in more outreach this
> year than in any previous year I am aware of. And in our
I would not call asking top 15 registrars as an outreach. I would call it a
selective segment approach.
> dealings with them they have been more open and responsive to
I would use the word responsive if CHANGES ARE MADE after all our
discussion. Its too early to use the word responsive
> Our vote may not affect our involvement in the ICANN process
> overall, but I am convinced it could certainly affect the
> level of outreach to registrars in subsequent years budget
> formulations.
And have you considered the fact that there may not BE TOO MANY REGISTRARS
to OUTREACH next year if this budget remains the way it is?
> We should think our response through, and its long term
> impact, very carefully.
"long term" is precisely the idea we have in our mind too
Best Regards
Bhavin Turakhia
Founder, CEO and Chairman
DirectI
--------------------------------------
http://www.directi.com
Direct Line: +91 (22) 5679 7600
Direct Fax: +91 (22) 5679 7510
Board Line (USA): +1 (415) 240 4172
Board Line (India): +91 (22) 5679 7500
--------------------------------------
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|