ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] 66% needed for approval

  • To: "'Tim Ruiz'" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Rick Wesson'" <wessorh@xxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] 66% needed for approval
  • From: "Bhavin Turakhia" <bhavin.t@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 20:48:50 +0530
  • Cc: "'Monte Cahn'" <monte@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Rob Hall'" <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Jean-Michel Becar'" <jmbecar@xxxxxx>, "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <006b01c444bd$a434d4d0$fa05a8c0@TIMRUIZ>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcREvi6hQX7c4zbaTSSGjbIg0YoCYwACD58A

> Was the process perfect this year? No. Kurt admitted that 
> himself. But the ICANN staff engaged in more outreach this 
> year than in any previous year I am aware of. And in our 

I would not call asking top 15 registrars as an outreach. I would call it a
selective segment approach.

> dealings with them they have been more open and responsive to 

I would use the word responsive if CHANGES ARE MADE after all our
discussion. Its too early to use the word responsive

> Our vote may not affect our involvement in the ICANN process 
> overall, but I am convinced it could certainly affect the 
> level of outreach to registrars in subsequent years budget 
> formulations.

And have you considered the fact that there may not BE TOO MANY REGISTRARS
to OUTREACH next year if this budget remains the way it is?

> We should think our response through, and its long term 
> impact, very carefully.

"long term" is precisely the idea we have in our mind too

Best Regards
Bhavin Turakhia
Founder, CEO and Chairman
DirectI
--------------------------------------
http://www.directi.com
Direct Line: +91 (22) 5679 7600
Direct Fax: +91 (22) 5679 7510
Board Line (USA): +1 (415) 240 4172
Board Line (India): +91 (22) 5679 7500
-------------------------------------- 




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>