ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] 66% needed for approval

  • To: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [registrars] 66% needed for approval
  • From: Rick Wesson <wessorh@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 00:01:31 -0700
  • Cc: "'Monte Cahn'" <monte@xxxxxxxxxxx>, ross@xxxxxxxxxx, "'Rob Hall'" <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Jean-Michel Becar'" <jmbecar@xxxxxx>, "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <004901c44429$f747eb10$fa05a8c0@TIMRUIZ>
  • References: <004901c44429$f747eb10$fa05a8c0@TIMRUIZ>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
Tim,
I just want to point out that we are already out of the process. If we were involved we would have had more say in the development of the budget and not be presented with a near final draft.
Our vote will have no impact on our "involvement, in ICANN" 
-rick


Tim Ruiz wrote:


Monte,

I never meant to suggest that we shouldn't be firm. I am concerned that if
we are not careful we may take ourselves out of the process altogether. All
we are really doing when we vote is deciding whether we want to pay ICANN
directly, or through the registries, we do not really *approve* the budget.
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>