<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] RE: Appeal to ICANN Finance committee to modify ICANN Budget proposal
- To: tbarrett <tbarrett@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Bhavin Turakhia'" <bhavin.t@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Kurt Pritz'" <pritz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] RE: Appeal to ICANN Finance committee to modify ICANN Budget proposal
- From: Jim Archer <jim@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 17:14:07 -0400
- Cc: "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <007101c43ddb$f9b69080$6601a8c0@blackdell>
- References: <007101c43ddb$f9b69080$6601a8c0@blackdell>
- Reply-to: Jim Archer <jim@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--On Wednesday, May 19, 2004 4:00 PM -0400 tbarrett <tbarrett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
As a quasi-governmental body, ICANN generates funds through taxes from
registrars and registries. As tax-payers, we need to push for a cap on
the annual growth of taxes that we pay to ICANN. The ICANN staff and
A close analogy, except that ICANN gets to elect it's own board members.
Would anyone care to meet in Marina del Rey and toss some tea into the
ocean?
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|