<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] ICANN Proposed budget is out for public comment
- To: "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] ICANN Proposed budget is out for public comment
- From: "Jay Westerdal" <jwesterdal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 10:41:40 -0700
- In-reply-to: <200405181719.i4IHJ7806949@pechora.icann.org>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcQ84Spoc/68MBKUSBiDcdFcsraURgADOSDwAAOFWIAAAKw2cA==
When we reach 38 Registrars left, each Registrar will pay $100K per year,
ironically the same fee as running a Registry.
I would agree, registries should pay based on how many domains they have,
rather then a flat Registry fee. If I can pay $100K for a Registry, where do
I sign up?
Jay Westerdal
Name Intelligence, Inc.
http://www.nameintelligence.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bhavin Turakhia
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 10:20 AM
To: 'Registrars Constituency'
Subject: RE: [registrars] ICANN Proposed budget is out for public comment
> This is a plan to get rid of smaller registrars. That is my
> two cents on this situation. I would vote for $0.49 per
> domain flat, rather then making the smallest registrar in
I would much rather myself vote for a $0.49 flat fee per domain year than
vote for a model where smaller Registrars are bearing a higher cost than the
larger ones. Offcourse id even much rather see a portion of that $0.49 come
out of Registries who are already making fixed margins.
bhavin
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|