<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] ICANN Proposed budget is out for public comment
- To: "Rick Wesson" <wessorh@xxxxxx>, "Jean-Michel Becar" <jmbecar@xxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] ICANN Proposed budget is out for public comment
- From: "Patricio Valdes" <valdes@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 22:52:30 -0500
- Cc: "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- References: <40A97144.7090307@gmo.jp> <40A97BB1.2040907@ar.com>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Please tell me I read wrong, they want to charge a per transaction fee of
$.25. On top of that, $4,000 a year for the accreditation plus $19,000 a
year for the Variable Registrar Support?
Please tell me Im wrong! The $19,000 is assuming ALL 197 Reigstrars will
pay. What happens when some of these Registrars dissappear? Will it also
increase?
Please tell me Im wrong!
Patricio Valdes
Parava Networks
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rick Wesson" <wessorh@xxxxxx>
To: "Jean-Michel Becar" <jmbecar@xxxxxx>
Cc: "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 9:57 PM
Subject: Re: [registrars] ICANN Proposed budget is out for public comment
> would those that have served on the budget committee provide specific
> comments on just what they did?
>
> It appears that the registrars burden will have increased 150% and I'm
> doubting that our reps did the registrars any good.
>
> would the reps on the budget committee please provide specific comments
> on just how they "helped" us this time?
>
> thanks,
>
> -rick
>
> Jean-Michel Becar wrote:
>
> >Dear fellows registrars,
> >
> >The ICANN proposed budget for 2004 just get out for public comment.
> >Enjoy the reading.
> >Jean-Michel
> >
> >
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|