<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] Revised draft for TF2
- To: Thomas Keller <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] Revised draft for TF2
- From: Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 14:08:13 +0000
- Cc: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>, registrars@xxxxxxxx, brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 13 Apr 2004 15:43:02 +0200." <20040413134302.GJ17839@schlund.de>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thomas,
I suggest adopting the language that the W3C's P3P activity has evolved.
It isn't the only possible choice, but they have spent some time on it,
so terms like <purpose> and who's purpose is expressed in a <purpose>
statement, the sense I get of this morning's exchange of notes between
Ross and yourself, could be about well-defined terms, rather than a new
discussion about terms and the application, in our case, whois policy
varients.
Also, could you post a text copy of the word document?
Eric
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|