ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] Revised draft for TF2

  • To: Thomas Keller <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [registrars] Revised draft for TF2
  • From: Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 14:08:13 +0000
  • Cc: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>, registrars@xxxxxxxx, brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 13 Apr 2004 15:43:02 +0200." <20040413134302.GJ17839@schlund.de>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Thomas,

I suggest adopting the language that the W3C's P3P activity has evolved.
It isn't the only possible choice, but they have spent some time on it,
so terms like <purpose> and who's purpose is expressed in a <purpose>
statement, the sense I get of this morning's exchange of notes between
Ross and yourself, could be about well-defined terms, rather than a new
discussion about terms and the application, in our case, whois policy
varients.

Also, could you post a text copy of the word document?

Eric



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>