<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] FW: [dow1tf] TR: IPC constituency statement for Whois TF1
- To: Paul Stahura <stahura@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] FW: [dow1tf] TR: IPC constituency statement for Whois TF1
- From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 11:07:12 -0500
- Cc: "'registrars@xxxxxxxx'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <DA6F8AFB015C544AB4385B5DEBDE1FBB0C1C3D@mail.enom.com>
- Organization: Tucows Inc.
- References: <DA6F8AFB015C544AB4385B5DEBDE1FBB0C1C3D@mail.enom.com>
- Reply-to: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5+ (Windows/20040215)
On 3/29/2004 7:05 PM Paul Stahura noted that:
I don't think that TF1 is focused on technical solutions,
Hm. Perhaps I should re-read the IPC submission, but it seems to take
a very technical approach to what is obviously a policy issue.
> If you or
any registrar has any policy recommendations or statements regarding whois
data mining, please send me a note, or post them to the list, and I will
include them in the draft.
I believe that currently practices are generally acceptable (i.e. -
the market is generally doing a good job with meeting demands here)
but that we need to have the capability to deny service to users that
are data-mining the interfaces. Accessibility concerns are generally
not well-dealt with by current implementations, so I'd like to see
some further discussion around those issues as well.
--
-rwr
"Don't be too timid and squeamish about your actions.
All life is an experiment.
The more experiments you make the better."
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com
My Blogware: http://www.byte.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|