<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] FW: [dow1tf] TR: IPC constituency statement for Whois TF1
- To: Paul Stahura <stahura@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] FW: [dow1tf] TR: IPC constituency statement for Whois TF1
- From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 14:05:08 -0500
- Cc: "'registrars@xxxxxxxx'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <DA6F8AFB015C544AB4385B5DEBDE1FBB0C1C36@mail.enom.com>
- Organization: Tucows Inc.
- References: <DA6F8AFB015C544AB4385B5DEBDE1FBB0C1C36@mail.enom.com>
- Reply-to: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5+ (Windows/20040215)
On 3/29/2004 1:54 PM Paul Stahura noted that:
Fellow registrars, please find attached the IPC constituency statement.
I will be writing a very rough draft of a statement from us for TF1 and
submitting it to the list shortly.
"We propose that this effort be conducted by a small group
representing all directly affected interests, on a realistic
timeframe, and in a manner that will encourage candid consideration of
the technical issues involved..."
Am I reading this correctly? Did the IPC just commit to sending
delegates to the IETF CRISP Working Group?
--
-rwr
"Don't be too timid and squeamish about your actions.
All life is an experiment.
The more experiments you make the better."
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com
My Blogware: http://www.byte.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|