<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] RE: New STLD dates for public comment
- To: "Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine" <brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] RE: New STLD dates for public comment
- From: "Michael D. Palage" <michael@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:57:15 -0500
- Cc: "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <200403181453.i2IErG87092325@nic-naa.net>
- Reply-to: <michael@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Eric:
I did enjoy your exchange regarding .IQ in Rome. If you ever choose a new
career it should be as a journalist. You ask tough questions :-)
During the presentation in Rome, Kurt stated that there were 14 applications
for passwords, so I would assume 14 is the top end number of potential TLD
applicants.
Best regards,
Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
[mailto:brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 9:53 AM
To: michael@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Registrars Constituency; brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [registrars] RE: New STLD dates for public comment
> ... he only provided numbers not the
> identity of the applicants nor the string they were seeking.
They can't all be trying to get .iq
;-)
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|