ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] Verisign sues ICANN over WLS and Sitefinder

  • To: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [registrars] Verisign sues ICANN over WLS and Sitefinder
  • From: Jean-Michel <jmbecar@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:04:03 +0900
  • Cc: Jean-Michel <jmbecar@xxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <403E9649.8040508@gmo.jp>
  • References: <DA6F8AFB015C544AB4385B5DEBDE1FBB0C1B2B@mail.enom.com> <403E9649.8040508@gmo.jp>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4

The top net villain named by UK industry ...the winner is......Guess what? ...yeah Verisigin !!!!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3506157.stm

Jean-Michel Becar

Jean-Michel wrote:

This story makes me think if we shouldn't separate the registry and the
zone root file operation functions . I don't really see them compatible
in term of interests. one is purely commercial (the registry) and the
other is for the sake of running internet so it's purely public interest
(the TLD root zone file management).

Having a such separation the registry won't be able to do whatever they
want with the DNS ... but I guess the registry contracts with ICANN
already contain the DNS management so will be hard to change.

Just a thought.
Jean-Michel Becar

Paul Stahura wrote:

Also
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=internetNews&storyID=4448733&s
ection=news


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rob Hall
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 1:46 PM
To: Registrars Constituency
Subject: [registrars] Verisign sues ICANN over WLS and Sitefinder

http://biz.yahoo.com/djus/040226/1629001168_1.html








<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>