[registrars] RE: WLS on ICANN's agenda

[Rick Wesson <wessorh@xxxxxx>]

Mike,

I hope you find this even more humorous =)

Since you are still a member of the constituency and apparently represent
two registrars as their constituency voting representative.

It would be, IMHO, unfair and anti-competitive for you to provide
privledged board member information relating to WLS to those registrars
you represent.

Since you are an ICANN board member and will have this information
regarding WLS negotiations with VeriSign how can we as competitors be
assured that you won't divulge information to those companies which you
represent within the constituency.

I hope that you will either recuse yourself from those discussions or make
the competitive information available to all within the constituency.

personal regards,


-rick


On Sat, 14 Feb 2004, Michael D. Palage wrote:

> Rick:
>
> Sometimes you make me laugh :-)
>
> Best regards,
>
> Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick Wesson [mailto:wessorh@xxxxxx]
> Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 8:41 PM
> To: Registrars List
> Cc: Michael D. Palage
> Subject: WLS on ICANN's agenda
>
>
>
> Will Mike Palage provide us some in site as to the board's negotiations with
> Verisign regarding WLS?
>
> I hope that mike still has some ties to Registrars enough to clue us in on
> what transpires next week.
>
> see http://www.icann.org/minutes/
>
>    Proposed Agenda:
>      ...
>       o WLS Negotiations with VeriSign
>
>
> -rick
>
>
>
>