ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Congressional Hearing

  • To: "Larry Erlich" <erlich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] Congressional Hearing
  • From: "Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 17:13:47 -0500
  • Cc: <registrars@xxxxxxxx>, <jeffrey@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcPw66dhIj8S1POCSUaJMOMM7+Qs2gAAJ0dA
  • Thread-topic: [registrars] Congressional Hearing

yes, it needs to be turned into a "letter" - but it is the "meat" of the submission

Elana Broitman
Register.com
575 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018
Phone (212) 798-9215
Fax   (212) 629-9309
ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx 


-----Original Message-----
From: root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf
Of Larry Erlich
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 7:15 PM
To: Elana Broitman
Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxx; jeffrey@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [registrars] Congressional Hearing


The document that I received appears
to be unfinished. It ends with 3 examples
of renewal scams?

Larry Erlich

http://www.DomainRegistry.com

Elana Broitman wrote:
> 
> You all may remember Brian Cute's recent posting on last week's US Congressional hearing on Whois accuracy.  We believe that given the risk that the US Congres
> 
> Because the Congress keeps the record open for only a short time frame, we don't have time to take a vote, but would like to get the document signed by as many
> 
> Thank you for your attention to this and please feel free to comment or send edits.
> 
> Best, Elana Broitman and Brian Cute
>  <<submission to ip subcommittee march 4.doc>>
> 
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>                     Name: submission to ip subcommittee march 4.doc
>   Attachment 2      Type: application/msword
>                 Encoding: base64



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>