<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Congressional Hearing
- To: "Larry Erlich" <erlich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Congressional Hearing
- From: "Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 17:13:47 -0500
- Cc: <registrars@xxxxxxxx>, <jeffrey@xxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcPw66dhIj8S1POCSUaJMOMM7+Qs2gAAJ0dA
- Thread-topic: [registrars] Congressional Hearing
yes, it needs to be turned into a "letter" - but it is the "meat" of the submission
Elana Broitman
Register.com
575 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018
Phone (212) 798-9215
Fax (212) 629-9309
ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf
Of Larry Erlich
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 7:15 PM
To: Elana Broitman
Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxx; jeffrey@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [registrars] Congressional Hearing
The document that I received appears
to be unfinished. It ends with 3 examples
of renewal scams?
Larry Erlich
http://www.DomainRegistry.com
Elana Broitman wrote:
>
> You all may remember Brian Cute's recent posting on last week's US Congressional hearing on Whois accuracy. We believe that given the risk that the US Congres
>
> Because the Congress keeps the record open for only a short time frame, we don't have time to take a vote, but would like to get the document signed by as many
>
> Thank you for your attention to this and please feel free to comment or send edits.
>
> Best, Elana Broitman and Brian Cute
> <<submission to ip subcommittee march 4.doc>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Name: submission to ip subcommittee march 4.doc
> Attachment 2 Type: application/msword
> Encoding: base64
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|