ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Whois development

  • To: "'Tim Ruiz'" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <michael@xxxxxxxxxx>, <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] Whois development
  • From: "Donny Simonton" <donny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 20:45:48 -0600
  • In-reply-to: <000701c3d720$dbb51970$fa05a8c0@TIMRUIZ>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcPXIkoveOYcr1+LTQ6UPZ2EqPOOpQAAX3eA

Actually if you refresh a few times now on google itself, WHOIS comes and
goes.  Seems like they might be taking it off.

Donny

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-
> registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 8:24 PM
> To: michael@xxxxxxxxxx; registrars@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [registrars] Whois development
> 
> Interesting. It looks like the service google links to is attempting to
> use
> Network Solutions' port 43, and it gets blocked most of the time, and
> rightfully so.
> 
> I fail to understand why registrars are expected to provide the
> infrastructure and support for third party ventures based primarily on
> high
> volume queries to our port 43.
> 
> Tim
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael D. Palage
> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 7:00 PM
> To: registrars@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: [registrars] Whois development
> 
> Hello All:
> 
> Check out Google's latest foray into the search environment. A Whois
> command
> line search from the Google search window.
> 
> http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/000114.html
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Michael
> 
> 
> 






<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>