RE: [registrars] FW: Budget Advisory Group Selection for 2004-2005

["Michael D. Palage" <michael@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Bob,

I agree. If you re-read my email I was not nominating anyone for the reasons
that you stated. What I was doing was agreeing with Rob's insightful
comments.

And I still work with active registrars on a regular basis, so I am fully
aware of your concerns.

Best regards,

Michael



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Robert F. Connelly
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 1:08 PM
To: Registrars Constituency
Subject: RE: [registrars] FW: Budget Advisory Group Selection for
2004-2005


At 12:48 PM 12/16/03 -0500, Michael D. Palage wrote:
>First, the budget process is very important and the three representatives
>you have nominated are well qualified and I believe that each would well
>represent the constituency.

Dear Michael:  We are always happy to hear from our senior
diplomats.  However, in this particular case, since you are on the ICANN
Budget Committee and we are selecting members of the Budget Advisory
Committee -- your *advisors* -- it would be better to have recommendations
come from the Registrars Constituency, persons in the active registration
business.

I'm sure you will find their advice helpful:-)

Cordially, BobC, Secretary of RC