<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] Policy Development process associated with changes in operation of a gtld registry
- To: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] Policy Development process associated with changes in operation of a gtld registry
- From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 11:04:39 -0500
- Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <AFEF39657AEEC34193C494DBD7179222029B85D4@phoenix.mit>
- Organization: Tucows Inc.
- References: <AFEF39657AEEC34193C494DBD7179222029B85D4@phoenix.mit>
- Reply-to: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4
On 12/3/2003 7:11 PM Bruce Tonkin noted that:
I would recommend that we ask one of our current reps to
gather constituency views since we are facing a short
timeline and this is really just a consensus reporting role.
What do people think?
I agree and recommend Ross Rader. Ross did a great job on the transfers
work last year.
I'd be pleased to help out. It will be especially useful in assisting me
understand the views of the constituency as the policy development
process plays out at the Names Council. I expect that this will be at
least as contentious as Transfers - this up front discovery will be
critical.
For those of you that haven't decided whether or not to attend today's
call, I'd strongly recommend that you do. Hearing from as many members
as possible is an important part of the constituency's consensus
development process.
--
-rwr
"Don't be too timid and squeamish about your actions.
All life is an experiment.
The more experiments you make the better."
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com
My Blogware: http://www.byte.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|