<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Deletes task force
- To: "Paul Stahura" <stahura@xxxxxxxx>, "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Deletes task force
- From: "Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:11:18 -0500
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcO46Bn4bQ1YDd8RT1eyZQf18/3DTQEtVjiA
- Thread-topic: [registrars] Deletes task force
i suggest we write a message, to be endorsed by those registrars supporting it, to the registry constituency.
Elana Broitman
Register.com
575 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018
Phone (212) 798-9215
Fax (212) 629-9309
ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Stahura [mailto:stahura@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 10:23 AM
To: Registrars Constituency
Subject: RE: [registrars] Deletes task force
Ross, Tom, Bruce
eNom as well
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Keller [mailto:tom@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 12:33 AM
To: Bruce Tonkin
Cc: ross@xxxxxxxxxx; Tim Ruiz; Registrars Constituency
Subject: Re: [registrars] Deletes task force
Ross,
this sounds like the right move into the right direction.
We would like to sign up as well.
Best,
tom
Am 02.12.2003 schrieb Bruce Tonkin:
> I support this colloborative approach.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Tuesday, 2 December 2003 3:00 PM
> > To: Tim Ruiz
> > Cc: 'Registrars Constituency'
> > Subject: Re: [registrars] Deletes task force
> >
> >
> > On 12/1/2003 10:36 PM Tim Ruiz noted that:
> >
> > > if the registries would just agree
> > > to charge at the end of the grace period, keeping
> > auto-renew in place,
> > > wouldn't we still have the best of both worlds?
> >
> > I think we would. At this point I propose the following;
> >
> > This doesn't strike me as being an ICANN or constituency
> > issue. As such,
> > we should probably move the discussion elsewhere. I am in the
> > process of
> > drafting a letter to the registries that outlines our
> > concerns and will
> > solicit additional registrar signatories throughout this week. This
> > letter will include an invitation to the registry operators
> > that engage
> > in this practice to participate in a teleconference at a to
> > be announced
> > time.
> >
> > I think it is in our best interests to look at this as a
> > customer/supplier issue and also be keenly cautious of the
> > legal issues
> > that may surround an action of this nature. I am specifically not
> > suggesting that we form any sort of collective bargaining group or
> > attempt to coerce the registries through some sort of
> > organized boycott
> > into adopting our viewpoint. I am simply proposing that we
> > gather in the
> > same room, allow them to hear our mutual concerns and specifically
> > request that they return to us with a proposal that will provide my
> > company, and presumably others, with more comfortable operating
> > arrangements.
> >
> > This is just off the top of my head and I'd be happy to modify the
> > concept with input from others. I will forward a draft later tomorrow
> > for review.
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> > -rwr
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "In the modern world the intelligence of public opinion is the one
> > indispensable condition for social progress."
> > - Charles W. Eliot (1834 - 1926)
> >
>
>
Gruss,
tom
(__)
(OO)_____
(oo) /|\ A cow is not entirely full of
| |--/ | * milk some of it is hamburger!
w w w w
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|