<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Deletes task force
- To: "Rob Hall" <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Deletes task force
- From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 11:51:18 +1100
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcO4Qqx+j5qS5LcYRvuZ0iIVtZ55bgAK0jTw
- Thread-topic: [registrars] Deletes task force
Hello Rob,
>
> However, one way to skin the cat and make everyone happy
> would be for the Registry to allow Registrars to choose what
> method they prefer. It should be a simple flag at the
> Registry I would think.
>
That would be my preference too. In the past I have requested the
registry operators consider a change where we are not charged until the
end of the auto-renew grace period
(if it is a grace period why do we get charged up front).
At this stage I am not aware of any registry operators planning to
change the operation of the business rules associated with the
registry-registrar protocol, and I expect that any such change would
require separate ICANN approval.
The new delete policy does require registrars to delete names that are
not renewed.
Regards,
Bruce
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|