ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Deletes task force

  • To: <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] Deletes task force
  • From: "Rob Hall" <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 16:39:04 -0500
  • Cc: "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Importance: Normal
  • In-reply-to: <3FCB99DA.3080507@tucows.com>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

While I agree with the decoupling of the billing issue, I still stand by
that we prefer an explicit renew to this auto-renew stuff we see now.

Rob.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:43 PM
To: Rob Hall
Cc: Registrars Constituency
Subject: Re: [registrars] Deletes task force


On 12/1/2003 2:33 PM Rob Hall noted that:

> However, one way to skin the cat and make everyone happy would be for the
> Registry to allow Registrars to choose what method they prefer.  It should
> be a simple flag at the Registry I would think.

Or decouple the issues entirely and convince the registries that they
should be charging their customers at the end of the period and not the
beginning. That would allow us to deal with the issue of the grace
period itself separately.

--

                        -rwr








                 "Don't be too timid and squeamish about your actions.
                                            All life is an experiment.
                             The more experiments you make the better."
                         - Ralph Waldo Emerson

Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com
My Blogware: http://www.byte.org






<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>