<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Deletes task force
- To: <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Rob Hall" <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Deletes task force
- From: "Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 15:32:05 -0500
- Cc: "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcO4SXSN3AZ1U05QSYSZOmISSd3djAAALcKw
- Thread-topic: [registrars] Deletes task force
agreed
Elana Broitman
Register.com
575 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018
Phone (212) 798-9215
Fax (212) 629-9309
ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:43 PM
To: Rob Hall
Cc: Registrars Constituency
Subject: Re: [registrars] Deletes task force
On 12/1/2003 2:33 PM Rob Hall noted that:
> However, one way to skin the cat and make everyone happy would be for the
> Registry to allow Registrars to choose what method they prefer. It should
> be a simple flag at the Registry I would think.
Or decouple the issues entirely and convince the registries that they
should be charging their customers at the end of the period and not the
beginning. That would allow us to deal with the issue of the grace
period itself separately.
--
-rwr
"Don't be too timid and squeamish about your actions.
All life is an experiment.
The more experiments you make the better."
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com
My Blogware: http://www.byte.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|