ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Representatives required for 3 WHOIS task forces

  • To: "'Robert F. Connelly'" <rconnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] Representatives required for 3 WHOIS task forces
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <chris@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 15:14:47 -0800
  • In-reply-to: <5.2.1.1.2.20031103140931.06a98e30@206.16.184.129>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcOiWXhDjOjogoX/SPet4YQy0PJzpAABpPrg

Most certainly. I wasn't contemplating additional representatives as much as
I was asking about providing input to the process.

Perhaps the best course of action would be to wait and see who the
representative will be, and then provide him/her with my input, for what
value it may have.

Christopher

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert F. Connelly
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 2:12 PM
To: Registrars Constituency
Subject: RE: [registrars] Representatives required for 3 WHOIS task forces

At 12:00 PM 11/3/03 -0800, Christopher Ambler wrote:
>May individuals participate in this process outside of being nominated to
>the taskforce? I suspect I have some input to the data elements discussion.
>Do you know if there will be a comment period?

Dear Christopher:  I'll leave it to Elana to respond to your question 
(mostly because I don't know:-)  However, it is noted that Paul Stahura has 
been nominated to the Whois task force on data mining.  I would think it 
best to have no more than one representative of a given firm on each task 
force. Regards, BobC


>Christophe







<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>