<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Representatives required for 3 WHOIS task forces
- To: "'Robert F. Connelly'" <rconnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Representatives required for 3 WHOIS task forces
- From: "Christopher Ambler" <chris@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 15:14:47 -0800
- In-reply-to: <5.2.1.1.2.20031103140931.06a98e30@206.16.184.129>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcOiWXhDjOjogoX/SPet4YQy0PJzpAABpPrg
Most certainly. I wasn't contemplating additional representatives as much as
I was asking about providing input to the process.
Perhaps the best course of action would be to wait and see who the
representative will be, and then provide him/her with my input, for what
value it may have.
Christopher
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert F. Connelly
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 2:12 PM
To: Registrars Constituency
Subject: RE: [registrars] Representatives required for 3 WHOIS task forces
At 12:00 PM 11/3/03 -0800, Christopher Ambler wrote:
>May individuals participate in this process outside of being nominated to
>the taskforce? I suspect I have some input to the data elements discussion.
>Do you know if there will be a comment period?
Dear Christopher: I'll leave it to Elana to respond to your question
(mostly because I don't know:-) However, it is noted that Paul Stahura has
been nominated to the Whois task force on data mining. I would think it
best to have no more than one representative of a given firm on each task
force. Regards, BobC
>Christophe
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|