<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] RE: ICANN fees
- To: Rick Wesson <wessorh@xxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] RE: ICANN fees
- From: Jim Archer <jarcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 16:16:05 -0400
- Cc: monte@xxxxxxxxxxx, ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx, registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, registrars@xxxxxxxx, eric@xxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20031014130644.07af8913.wessorh@ar.com>
- References: <12565338.1066143749@[192.168.1.155]> <20031014130644.07af8913.wessorh@ar.com>
- Reply-to: Jim Archer <jarcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--On Tuesday, October 14, 2003 1:06 PM -0700 Rick Wesson <wessorh@xxxxxx>
wrote:
sleeper is the word for you, complain about something you can effect. you
had better learn to be proactive or ICANN will always increase your fees.
We complain about plenty of stuff, and have been, including this issue. No
one ever seems interested. Remember the thick registry idea?
*************************
James W. Archer
CEO
http://www.RegistrationTek.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|