Re: [registrars] RE: Election of RC Reps to the GNSO Council

[Rick Wesson <wessorh@xxxxxx>]

Here are my thoughts when composing this ballot.

   a) we only have a job description for 2 RC GNSO reps
   b) we haven't defined what responsibilities the alternate has if the GNSO
       does not allow us a 3rd rep.
   c) we don't know if we need an alternate rep, we only know we might.

Since the position is ranked by number of votes an alternate will be 
identified by the looser of position #2.

It seemed to be more fair to work the ballot this way insted of voting for 3
as we have an undocumented job description for alternate and if an alternate 
is not needed then we don't have some one claiming that they were elected to 
this position even though it does not exist.

I hope this note clarifies whey we are only voting for 2 positions, as there 
are only 2 positions open for election.

best,

-rick

On Wednesday 08 October 2003 4:01 pm, Jean-Michel Becar wrote:
> Extract from the ballot: "Please select two individuals to represent
> registrar interests on the GNSO Counsel."
>
> Aren't we suppose to choose 3?
>
> JMB
>
> Elana Broitman wrote:
> >Rick - it appears from John's post today that his email may have bounced.
> >
> >Given that Bob had included John's note before the deadline cut off' we
> > should count it and change the ballot to include Bob
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
>
> From: 	Alice's Registry Help Desk
>
> >Sent:	Wed Oct 08 18:26:57 2003
> >To:	Robert F. Connelly; Registrars Executive Committee; Registrars
> > Constituency Subject:	Re: [registrars] RE: Election of RC Reps to the
> > GNSO Council
> >
> >Bob,
> >
> >I don't doubt you recieved the second, if you could just point it out to
> > me on the registrars mailing list
> >see http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/registrars/
> >
> >thanks,
> >
> >-rick
> >
> >On Wednesday 08 October 2003 3:15 pm, Robert F. Connelly wrote:
> >>At 02:32 PM 10/5/03 -0400, John Wong wrote:
> >>
> >>[Dear Rick:  Here it is.  Regards, BobC]
> >>
> >>>I would like to second this nomination.
> >>>
> >>>John Wong
> >>>
> >>>Jean-Michel Becar wrote:
> >>>>I would like to nominate Bob Connelly as the alternate representative.
> >>>>
> >>>>I've known Bob for more than 5 years now from the early time of that
> >>>> big adventure that Domain Names are, so his experience, and his
> >>>> knowledge will make him a very good alternate representative.