<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] RE: Election of RC Reps to the GNSO Council
- To: "Rob Hall" <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] RE: Election of RC Reps to the GNSO Council
- From: "Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 09:44:45 -0400
- Cc: "Alice's Registry Help Desk" <support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Registrars Executive Committee" <rc-excom@xxxxxx>, "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcOOa3+5gFs1oAxZT9iGT2MDQozylg==
- Thread-topic: [registrars] RE: Election of RC Reps to the GNSO Council
This case is different as bob was the secretary and the candidate
In the future the nomination should also be sent to the ex com at least
But in any case the ballot has been updated to include bob
Resolving the imediate issue
-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Hall
Sent: Wed Oct 08 23:49:41 2003
To: Elana Broitman
Cc: Alice's Registry Help Desk; Robert F. Connelly; Registrars Executive Committee; Registrars Constituency
Subject: Re: [registrars] RE: Election of RC Reps to the GNSO Council
Actually, as Bob has so eloquently pointed out, posting to the list seems to
not matter.
Our bylaws state that the nomination and second must be sent to the
constituency secretary to be official.
I believe there is no desention that this occured.
Rob.
P.S. And I won't even begin to bring up the fact that I bet the other
nominations and seconds were not sent to the secretary, but rather just posted
to the list <huge grin>.
Quoting Elana Broitman <ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Rick - it appears from John's post today that his email may have bounced.
>
> Given that Bob had included John's note before the deadline cut off' we
> should count it and change the ballot to include Bob
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alice's Registry Help Desk
> Sent: Wed Oct 08 18:26:57 2003
> To: Robert F. Connelly; Registrars Executive Committee; Registrars
> Constituency
> Subject: Re: [registrars] RE: Election of RC Reps to the GNSO Council
>
> Bob,
>
> I don't doubt you recieved the second, if you could just point it out to me
> on the registrars mailing list
> see http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/registrars/
>
> thanks,
>
> -rick
>
> On Wednesday 08 October 2003 3:15 pm, Robert F. Connelly wrote:
> > At 02:32 PM 10/5/03 -0400, John Wong wrote:
> >
> > [Dear Rick: Here it is. Regards, BobC]
> >
> > >I would like to second this nomination.
> > >
> > >John Wong
> > >
> > >Jean-Michel Becar wrote:
> > >>I would like to nominate Bob Connelly as the alternate representative.
> > >>
> > >>I've known Bob for more than 5 years now from the early time of that big
> > >>adventure that Domain Names are, so his experience, and his knowledge
> > >>will make him a very good alternate representative.
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|