ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Third Draft Standard form of authorisation for use by losing registrars after a transfer is initiated

  • To: "Gary Boyd" <Gary.Boyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] Third Draft Standard form of authorisation for use by losing registrars after a transfer is initiated
  • From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 20:25:05 +1000
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcOOPyFqm/k8D4ixTJmE4Oo6/qFtiQAEDqDw
  • Thread-topic: [registrars] Third Draft Standard form of authorisation for use by losing registrars after a transfer is initiated

 Hello Gary,

> 
> If a message is to be sent by the losing registrar after the 
> registrant has provided authorisation to the gaining 
> registrar, then the opportunity to obstruct transfers will 
> still exist as is the case today.

Yes I am sure that there are plenty of opportunities to continue to
obstruct transfers.
Hopefully a better policy and better dispute resolution will be an
improvement but time will tell.
We are still struggling to get any changes added to the agreements.

> 
> This is particularly noticeable if one looks at a large 
> number of domains used in a previous example by Tim, the 
> gaining registrar may use one email to gain authorisation for 
> 500 domains but the losing registrar may choose to send one 
> per domain.
> 

Not sure how to manage that.  I think the general consensus is to allow
a single message to apply to mulitple domains, but I think for now we
need to leave the choice to the discretion of the registrar.

Regards,
Bruce




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>