<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Third Draft Standard form of authorisation for use by losing registrars after a transfer is initiated
- To: "Gary Boyd" <Gary.Boyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Third Draft Standard form of authorisation for use by losing registrars after a transfer is initiated
- From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 20:25:05 +1000
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcOOPyFqm/k8D4ixTJmE4Oo6/qFtiQAEDqDw
- Thread-topic: [registrars] Third Draft Standard form of authorisation for use by losing registrars after a transfer is initiated
Hello Gary,
>
> If a message is to be sent by the losing registrar after the
> registrant has provided authorisation to the gaining
> registrar, then the opportunity to obstruct transfers will
> still exist as is the case today.
Yes I am sure that there are plenty of opportunities to continue to
obstruct transfers.
Hopefully a better policy and better dispute resolution will be an
improvement but time will tell.
We are still struggling to get any changes added to the agreements.
>
> This is particularly noticeable if one looks at a large
> number of domains used in a previous example by Tim, the
> gaining registrar may use one email to gain authorisation for
> 500 domains but the losing registrar may choose to send one
> per domain.
>
Not sure how to manage that. I think the general consensus is to allow
a single message to apply to mulitple domains, but I think for now we
need to leave the choice to the discretion of the registrar.
Regards,
Bruce
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|