ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] ICANN Carthage Meeting Topic: gTLD Registrar Domain-Name Deletion Policy

  • To: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [registrars] ICANN Carthage Meeting Topic: gTLD Registrar Domain-Name Deletion Policy
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 07:36:02 -0700
  • In-reply-to: <000b01c38cc8$81357d20$1802a8c0@HPPAVILION>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<html>
<body>
At 07:45 AM 10/7/03 -0400, Ken Stubbs
wrote:<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>
<dl>
<dd>[3.2.1] In the event that a domain which is the subject of a UDRP
dispute is deleted or expires during the course of the dispute, a
complainant in the UDRP dispute will have the option to renew or restore
the name under the same commercial terms as the registrant. If the
complainant renews or restores the name, the name will be placed
in<font color="#FF0000"> Registrar HOLD and Registrar LOCK status,</font>
</blockquote>
</dl>Dear Registrars:&nbsp; IFAIK, the RRP does not provide for such a
double status.&nbsp; Regards, BobC<br><br>
</body>
</html>
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>