Re: [registrars] Fw: [council] Final Resolution regarding Verisign Registry Site Finder Service
As we can see the GNSO council advice to ICANN for that wildcard story is really far from the push we want as registrar. So still wondering if we won't have better a better voice by going directly to ICANN BoD. The public reaction and comment are obvious for the past 2 weeks I've never heard someone in favor of this wildcard thing and that resolution want to listen first.......why things are taking so long??? I'm asking again the question can we as the RC writes a common letter to ICANN? or one by one as Registrar write a letter each to ICANN? It's obvious the GNSO council resolution doesn't reflect at all the consensus we could see last 2 weeks which is : STOP that service NOW !!!! Wondering how we can make this process more accurate. -- Jean-Michel Becar Senior Architect Global Media Online INC. Tokyo - 150-8512 Tel: +81 (0)3 5456 2687 Broitman wrote: Thank you Ken. I wonder if our representatives have any explanation regarding the resolution - namely, "monitor community reaction and experiences with the new service" -- does this call for the registrar constituency to provide input regarding its concerns, in addition to the motion that the constituency had passed? Thanks, Elana ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: "Registrars" <Registrars@xxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 1:34 PM Subject: [registrars] Fw: [council] Final Resolution regarding Verisign Registry Site Finder ServiceFYI ----- Original Message ----- From: "GNSO SECRETARIAT" <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 10:52 AM Subject: [council] Final Resolution regarding Verisign Registry SiteFinderService[To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] GNSO Council teleconference 25 September 2003. http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/agenda-25sep03.shtml Item 4. Issues associated with Verisign's introduction of wild cardentries(*.com and *.net in the .com and .net zonefile) Final Resolution regarding Verisign Registry Site Finder ServiceproposedbyMarilyn Cade and voted on by Council: Whereas, on September 15, 2003, VeriSign Registry introduced a wild card service into .com and .net zones that creates a registry-synthesizedaddressrecord in response to look ups of domain names that are not present inthezone. This service changes the routing of traffic by directing trafficthatwould have otherwise resulted in a 'no domain' notification to the"sender"to a VeriSign operated web site with search results and links to paid advertisements. Whereas the IAB commentary published its architectural Concerns on theuseof DNS wildcards on 19 September 2003. (LINK) Whereas VeriSign Registry on 21 September 2003, responded to PaulTwomey,President and CEO, ICANN, acknowledging ICANN's advisory and decliningtosuspend the service until they (VeriSign) has an opportunity to collectandreview available data. Whereas the Security and Stability Advisory Committee, 22 September2003,haspublished its recommendations at www.icann.org Therefore, the gNSO Council: Supports ICANN's actions to 1) monitor community reaction and experiences with the new service 2) request advice from the Security and Stability Advisory Committee and from the IAB on the impact of change introduced by the registry serviceofVeriSign 3) encourages broad participation by the community in the upcomingmeetinghosted by the Security and Stability Advisory Committee Pledges to 1) Support the recommendation of of the Security and Stability Advisory Committee, 22 September 2003 2) work cooperatively to ensure full opportunity to fully understand the service, its implications for the DNS, and any implications for the needforpolicy development within the scope of the gNSO. The motion carried, 17 votes in support 6 abstaining votes. GNSO Secretariat
|