RE: [registrars] GNSO's role in the SiteFinder affair

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jean-Michel,

I would think that root level wildcards in the DNS on COM and NET would
be a "substantive policy relating to generic top-level domains." 

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jean-Michel Becar
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 2:23 AM
To: registrars@xxxxxxxx
Subject: [registrars] GNSO's role in the SiteFinder affair

Dear all,

Reading once again the ICANN's bylaws it looks like the GNSO council's
role within ICANN is very limited:

ICANN bylaws, Article X, section 1:
"responsible for developing and recommending to the ICANN Board
substantive policies relating to generic top-level domains"

So I'm wondering how our voice about the SiteFinder will be heard from
the council. Looks like that matter is more between ICANN staff and
Verisign .... also the way Verisign respnded to ICANN ignoring all the
IAB and SESAC reports really worry me.

Does Verisgn have the right to do watether they want on Internet ????

 
-- 
Jean-Michel Becar
Senior Architect
Global Media Online INC.
Tokyo - 150-8512
Tel: +81 (0)3 5456 2687