<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Vrsn Wildcard Update
- To: "'Michael D. Palage'" <michael@xxxxxxxxxx>, <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Vrsn Wildcard Update
- From: "Donny Simonton" <donny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 22:18:52 -0500
- In-reply-to: <NFBBLJNJELIAEBHKGJNMGENOGKAA.michael@palage.com>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcN/IEUChMQ3He+0RnSemc2kVYregAAA7PkQ
I doubt if they will voluntarily shut the service down based on one reason,
the amount of money they are making per day. Let's take a guesstimation on
how much profit they are making a day with this system.
Overture did $265,332,000 in revenue last quarter which breaks down to
$2,948,133.33 per day in revenue. It was reported that yahoo and MSN
produce 54% of that revenue, I was not able to find the exact numbers, but
MSN does produce more of the revenue per day that Yahoo.
So let's assume Yahoo does 25% and MSN 29%. For our guesstimation we will
say that SiteFinder is doing 15% of Overtures' daily revenue which would be
$442,220 per day. In most cases with Overture you will get 40% of the
revenue from Overture, which would be a nice $176,888 per day in profit.
But I'm sure they have a better deal.
I sure know I wouldn't shut down something with the potential of $64,564,120
per year in profit. Would you voluntarily shutdown SiteFinder? Neither will
Verisign. ICANN will have to tell them to shut it down or else.
A concerned domain registrar.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-
> registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael D. Palage
> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 9:35 PM
> To: registrars@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: [registrars] Vrsn Wildcard Update
>
> For those following the SiteFinder discussion, the following may be of
> interest to you.
>
> http://www.icann.org/announcements/advisory-19sep03.htm
> http://www.iab.org/documents/docs/2003-09-20-dns-wildcards.html
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|