ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] Verisign change to operation of the .com DNS lookup service

  • To: "Michael D. Palage" <michael@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [registrars] Verisign change to operation of the .com DNS lookup service
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 11:13:26 -0400
  • Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxx
  • In-reply-to: <NFBBLJNJELIAEBHKGJNMKEIAGKAA.michael@palage.com>
  • Organization: Tucows Inc.
  • References: <NFBBLJNJELIAEBHKGJNMKEIAGKAA.michael@palage.com>
  • Reply-to: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030901 Thunderbird/0.2

On 9/16/2003 11:00 AM Michael D. Palage noted that:

Ross,

Thanks for the answers. I do not know about the questions being "loaded" but
they were meant to be tough questions (for both sides of the argument) that
would provide the quickest means of getting to the core issues.

I should have been clearer about that remark. I mean "loaded" in the sense that there seems to be a presumption that the service is desirable and places the onus on the community to demonstrate why this is a bad thing. Verisign is the one that needs to demonstrate why this is desirable and how the benefits to the community will exceed currently accepted practices resolvers.

I don't think they can. Even if I am wrong and there are benefits to doing things this way, it is simply not right to allow a corporation to throw away 20 years of DNS best practices because they feel like it. I want to be convinced, or I want it to go away.

--


                       -rwr











<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>