<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] RE: Registrar Approval of Variable Accreditation Fee for 2003-2004
- To: <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] RE: Registrar Approval of Variable Accreditation Fee for 2003-2004
- From: "Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 10:50:18 -0400
- Cc: <wessorh@xxxxxx>, "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcNyKeM8KYhh8cI+TvutlA7TT9G8jwAAL+rA
- Thread-topic: [registrars] RE: Registrar Approval of Variable Accreditation Fee for 2003-2004
yes - but, as a general overview, without identifying specific companies
Elana Broitman
Register.com
575 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018
Phone (212) 798-9215
Fax (212) 629-9309
ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 10:45 AM
To: Elana Broitman
Cc: wessorh@xxxxxx; Bruce Tonkin; registrars@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [registrars] RE: Registrar Approval of Variable
Accreditation Fee for 2003-2004
On 9/3/2003 10:36 AM Elana Broitman noted that:
> On the same note, I am again going out to everyone with a request for some data (even merely anecdotal) on how you comply with whois accuracy requirements in the RAA and cost of doing so. This is very important to provide before tomorrow's Congressional hearing in order help protect us from "unfunded mandates" based on incomplete information supplied by interest groups pushing for more Whois verification and availability.
Is it the intent to provide this information to Congress on behalf of
the RC?
--
-rwr
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|