ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] RE: Registrar Approval of Variable Accreditation Fee for 2003-2004

  • To: Elana Broitman <ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [registrars] RE: Registrar Approval of Variable Accreditation Fee for 2003-2004
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 10:44:32 -0400
  • Cc: wessorh@xxxxxx, Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, registrars@xxxxxxxx
  • In-reply-to: <BCAAA5D64C837641A9EBB93E2A50894803553AC8@ex2k01.corp.register.com>
  • Organization: Tucows Inc.
  • References: <BCAAA5D64C837641A9EBB93E2A50894803553AC8@ex2k01.corp.register.com>
  • Reply-to: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030820 Mozilla Thunderbird/0.2a
On 9/3/2003 10:36 AM Elana Broitman noted that:


On the same note, I am again going out to everyone with a request for some data (even merely anecdotal) on how you comply with whois accuracy requirements in the RAA and cost of doing so.  This is very important to provide before tomorrow's Congressional hearing in order help protect us from "unfunded mandates" based on incomplete information supplied by interest groups pushing for more Whois verification and availability.
Is it the intent to provide this information to Congress on behalf of the RC? 

--


                       -rwr
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>