RE: [registrars] Whois-sc: input requested
- To: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Whois-sc: input requested
- From: Mark Jeftovic <markjr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 13:52:15 -0400 (EDT)
- Cc: <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <06b801c36f1e$c16687d0$fa05a8c0@TIMRUIZ>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, Tim Ruiz wrote:
> Mark, either you forgot the attachment or our mail server removed it.
> Could you copy the document in to an email and send it again?
You must be using Outlook, for some reason it has problems with
attachments from pine.
I've put it online here:
The HTML version has the table laid out, and the 5 selected there are
slightly different than what I posted, they are:
5, 10, 12, 13, 14
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark Jeftovic
> Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 11:16 AM
> To: registrars@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: [registrars] Whois-sc: input requested
> After the conference call for the whois-sc of Aug 7/8th the table
> attached citing the intersection of the main concerns of the various
> participating members was compiled.
> The next step is an attempt to narrow this down to 5 key points.
> All members are to report back with their list of 5 points by thursday
> september 4th. I apologize for the lack of notice, we've been pretty
> busy with all the worm, virus, blackouts, etc. (I'm sure there's a lot
> of that going around).
> I think Tom Keller is away from email at the moment, for my part I've
> assembled a "default position" which I hope covers the major Registrar
> concerns wrt whois privacy. In lieu of any input, comment of feedback,
> I will be submitting the following five points (see attached text file):
> 8, 10, 12, 14, 17
> Regards, mark
Mark Jeftovic <markjr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Co-founder, easyDNS Technologies Inc.
ph. +1-(416)-535-8672 ext 225