<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] netsol wls marketing hipe
- To: Rick Wesson <wessorh@xxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] netsol wls marketing hipe
- From: Mark Jeftovic <markjr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 08:27:38 -0400 (EDT)
- Cc: Registrars List <Registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0308182028080.18557-100000@flash.ar.com>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Rick Wesson wrote:
>
> the third bullet seems to sum up the wls debate....
>
> see http://www.nextregistrationrights.com/
>
> Protect the names you have
>
The "protection" idea doesn't hold water for me under the current
implementation. Since a WLS subscription only lasts a year, to really
"protect" your name you need to renew your WLS annually, and the base
cost doing so is four times that of actually renewing your domain (which
you'll need to do anyway).
So WLS gives no real upside or protection to current domain holders.
-mark
--
Mark Jeftovic <markjr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Co-founder, easyDNS Technologies Inc.
ph. +1-(416)-535-8672 ext 225
fx. +1-(416)-535-0237
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|