Re: [registrars] Marina del Rey Registrar Meeting - September 12

[Larry Erlich <erlich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Bhavin,

In theory, if a domain name had 100 nameservers
setup ns1.nonpaidforname.com  through ns100.nonpaidforname.com
which WERE ATTACHED to 100 different domains then
that would take 100 renamings to, say,
ns[1-100].nonpaidforname.com.domainusedforthisstuff.com.
The workaround doesn't scale but it has been
working. That being said I also would prefer a real solution.

Larry Erlich

http://www.DomainRegistry.com

Bhavin Turakhia wrote:
> 
> > If the registries are willing to be more involved, then
> > perhaps they could take it upon themselves to agree to cancel
> > these names if the nameservers in question no longer ping. A
> > separate request to cancel names of this nature would be
> > submitted, the registry would check them out, and delete them
> > if appropriate.
> >
> > Other ideas?
> 
> Currently I believe we handle it by simply changing the nameservers to
> "nameservername.directideleteddomains.com". That works fine for us.
> Doesn't everyone do that?
> 
> bhavin

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Larry Erlich - DomainRegistry.com, Inc.
215-244-6700 - FAX:215-244-6605 - Reply: erlich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------------------------------