ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[Fwd: FW: [registrars] The New Responsive ICANN]

  • To: registrars@xxxxxxxx
  • Subject: [Fwd: FW: [registrars] The New Responsive ICANN]
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 10:58:33 -0400
  • Organization: Tucows Inc.
  • Reply-to: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030723 Thunderbird/0.1

Forwarded for Nikolaj;

-----Original Message-----
From: Nikolaj Nyholm Sent: 13. august 2003 14:02
To: ross@xxxxxxxxxx; Michael D. Palage
Cc: Registrars@xxxxxxxx; dam@xxxxxxxxx; 'Dan Halloran'
Subject: RE: [registrars] The New Responsive ICANN


I haven't followed this thread in full details, so I don't know how much is up to the constituency and how much is up to ICANN. Nonetheless, I would ask that a representant of a smaller registrar also be part.

I will second Paul Westley, as he would fit such profile.
/n

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 13. august 2003 12:46
> To: Michael D. Palage
> Cc: Registrars@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [registrars] The New Responsive ICANN
> > > On 8/12/2003 4:53 PM Michael D. Palage noted that:
> > Ross,
> > > > Listed below is a response from Tina Dam, the Chief Registry Liaison > > regarding the Transfer Assistance Group...<snip> > > > > Ross, I hope that you have been contacted...<snip> > > I called Tina after my message yesterday afternoon. My name > has been put > forward as a representative of the Transfers Task Force and I've > accepted ICANN's invitation. My understanding is that the > constituencies, the TTF and the ALAC have been contacted to > provide one > or two representatives to the TAG. I am not sure which constituencies > have put names forward (nor did I ask). If our constituency > has not yet > done so, I would urge us to do so quickly. Elections, under our new > bylaws, require a definite period of time to complete. > > If required, I second the self-nominations of both Paul > Westley and Paul > Stahura and support their wish to stand for the position(s)... > > [Forgive me if any of this is repetitive, but I have been less than > attentive to GNSO matters this summer.] > > -- > > > -rwr > > > > > > > >


--


                       -rwr











<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>