<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[Fwd: FW: [registrars] The New Responsive ICANN]
- To: registrars@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Fwd: FW: [registrars] The New Responsive ICANN]
- From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 10:58:33 -0400
- Organization: Tucows Inc.
- Reply-to: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030723 Thunderbird/0.1
Forwarded for Nikolaj;
-----Original Message-----
From: Nikolaj Nyholm
Sent: 13. august 2003 14:02
To: ross@xxxxxxxxxx; Michael D. Palage
Cc: Registrars@xxxxxxxx; dam@xxxxxxxxx; 'Dan Halloran'
Subject: RE: [registrars] The New Responsive ICANN
I haven't followed this thread in full details, so I don't
know how much is up to the constituency and how much is up to
ICANN. Nonetheless, I would ask that a representant of a
smaller registrar also be part.
I will second Paul Westley, as he would fit such profile.
/n
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 13. august 2003 12:46
> To: Michael D. Palage
> Cc: Registrars@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [registrars] The New Responsive ICANN
>
>
> On 8/12/2003 4:53 PM Michael D. Palage noted that:
> > Ross,
> >
> > Listed below is a response from Tina Dam, the Chief
Registry Liaison
> > regarding the Transfer Assistance Group...<snip>
> >
> > Ross, I hope that you have been contacted...<snip>
>
> I called Tina after my message yesterday afternoon. My name
> has been put
> forward as a representative of the Transfers Task Force and I've
> accepted ICANN's invitation. My understanding is that the
> constituencies, the TTF and the ALAC have been contacted to
> provide one
> or two representatives to the TAG. I am not sure which
constituencies
> have put names forward (nor did I ask). If our constituency
> has not yet
> done so, I would urge us to do so quickly. Elections, under our new
> bylaws, require a definite period of time to complete.
>
> If required, I second the self-nominations of both Paul
> Westley and Paul
> Stahura and support their wish to stand for the position(s)...
>
> [Forgive me if any of this is repetitive, but I have been less than
> attentive to GNSO matters this summer.]
>
> --
>
>
> -rwr
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
-rwr
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|