ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Regarding implementation of the transfers policy

  • To: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] Regarding implementation of the transfers policy
  • From: "Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 10:47:53 -0400
  • Cc: "Registrars List" <Registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcNdSzhrWgbhC8iLSluWwWa4U/Y9ZQAAb8iAABu/YuA=
  • Thread-topic: Regarding implementation of the transfers policy

Also, I have been asking Dan H about it.  He is committed to making this happen, but has been swamped with other matters.  I also asked him to schedule a meeting in conjunction with the Sept. 12th meeting.

Elana Broitman
575 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018
Phone (212) 798-9215
Fax   (212) 629-9309

-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Tonkin [mailto:Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 9:35 PM
To: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Registrars List
Subject: [registrars] Regarding implementation of the transfers policy

Hello Ross,

Following the Executive Committee's announcement on the date and
location for a registrars constituency meeting - I sent a message to Dan
Halloran suggesting that he convene a meeting the day before to discuss
the implementation of the transfers policy.  

I have yet to receive a reply.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@xxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Friday, 8 August 2003 11:20 AM
> To: Bruce Tonkin
> Cc: Registrars List
> Subject: Re: [registrars] wls and domain expiraion dates (9/11)
> On 8/7/2003 8:51 PM Bruce Tonkin noted that:
> >   Ie the WLS has
> > never been through an "implementation" committee process.
> Speaking of implementation committee's I guess its time for 
> my monthly 
> plea ;) - is there any news on transfers? I have heard from 
> ICANN that 
> there is a committee of some sort being formed, but I have neither a) 
> had the chance this week to call back and get full details, 
> nor b) heard 
> of any developments via the RC or other channels...
> Any word?
> -- 
> Regards,
>                        -rwr
> "Around computers it is difficult to find the correct unit of time to 
> measure progress. Some cathedrals took a century to complete. Can you 
> imagine the grandeur and scope of a program that would take as long?"
> 		- Unknown
> Got Blog?

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>