<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[reg-com] TR: Reminder: 17/18 May "Approval process for registry changes pdp" teleconference
- To: "reg-com" <reg-com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [reg-com] TR: Reminder: 17/18 May "Approval process for registry changes pdp" teleconference
- From: "GNSO SECRETARIAT" <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 10:03:24 +0200
- Importance: Normal
- Reply-to: <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-reg-com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>From : Philip Sheppard Envoye : lundi 17 mai 2004 09:47
A : gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc : council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Objet : RE: Reminder: 17/18 May "Approval process for registry changes
pdp" teleconference
I am unlikely to be able to make this call. I give my proxy to Grant then
Marilyn.
I can say however that I am overall broadly in favour of the flow charts
presented in the last version.
Guiding principles for any further change (if proposed) should be:
- is there an existing ICANN process that we can use here rather than
inventing a new one?
- is the process simple and easy to understand?
- is there the right balance between consultation and speed / simplicity?
Philip
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|