[ispcp] Fw: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] For your review - revised PI Working Definitions
High level overview of the frameworkFor those who like to comment at this stage I attach the draft definitions the Policy&Implementation WG (subteam) has provided so far for discussion. I am personally not fully satisfied with the result, in particular with the differentiation between a “capital p” Policy and a “lower case” policy. To my understanding this could be explained in written form only. But I’ve never heard talking people or “experts” in upper or lower cases. This document is still a draft until the WG shall have provided its report. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich From: Marika Konings Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 12:26 PM To: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] For your review - revised PI Working Definitions Dear All, On behalf of the definitions sub-team, please find attached an updated version of the proposed working definitions in which the sub-team has aimed to address the comments and feedback provided by the Working Group during the last meeting. As you review this document, please take into account that these working definitions have been developed for the limited use by the PI Working group as a starting point to facilitate the discussions and deliberations outlined in the WG's charter. These definitions are expected to evolve during and as a result of the WG deliberations. At the end of the process, the WG is expected to review these definitions, add/update as deemed appropriate and include them in the Final Report. Should you have any comments, proposed edits and/or questions, you are strongly encouraged to share these in advance of the next meeting (Wednesday 19 February) with the mailing list. Best regards, Marika Attachment:
PI Proposed Working Definitions - 12 February 2014.doc |