Re: [ispcp] public comment on the Thick Whois Initial Report

["Anthony Harris" <harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree with the short comment of support.

Tony Harris
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Tony Holmes 
  To: 'Mike O'Connor' ; ispcp@xxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 1:36 PM
  Subject: RE: [ispcp] public comment on the Thick Whois Initial Report


  Hi Mikey

  That approach still sounds a winner to me, we certainly need to add some weigh to the cause here. After years of bleating about the lack of thick WHOIS it would be remiss of us not to comment.

  Tony

   

  From: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
  Sent: 24 July 2013 17:15
  To: <ispcp@xxxxxxxxx>
  Subject: [ispcp] public comment on the Thick Whois Initial Report

   

   

  hi all,

   

  the initial comment period for the Thick Whois Initial Report is closed, but the reply-comment period is still open and will close on 4-Aug (slightly weird, since that is a Sunday).  

   

  i would be willing to go with either a simple email that states that we support the conclusion to require thick Whois across all gTLD registries (pretty much mirroring the ALAC), or draft up a longer version.  i'm leaning toward the short statement of support in this one.  is anybody uncomfortable with that?

   

  here's the link to the public comment page

   

              https://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/thick-whois-initial-21jun13-en.htm

   

  mikey

   


  PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)