ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ispcp]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ispcp] comments please: a drawing for our comment on policy vs. implementation

  • To: "<ispcp@xxxxxxxxx>" <ispcp@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [ispcp] comments please: a drawing for our comment on policy vs. implementation
  • From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:38:49 -0600
  • List-id: ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">hi all,<div><br></div><div>i'm drafting our reply-comments to the Policy vs Implementation working paper. &nbsp;as i've read the other comments, i have started to come to the position that we may be trying to over-legistlate this. &nbsp;my basic idea is this -- rather that a huge effort to develop detailed criteria for each possible Policy vs Implementation decision, what if we put a review by the AC/SO's into the process? &nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>so i've drawn a flow diagram of a possible way to handle the process and would be very interested in your thoughts. &nbsp;the two changes to the process implied by Marika's drawing are:</div><div><br></div><div>- insert the AC/SOs in the decision-making process</div><div><br></div><div>- indicate that the process of review is iterative -- that AC/SOs get to send the decision back to the staff for review/refinement</div><div><br></div><div>i think this does a few things</div><div><br></div><div>- it's an appropriate task for AC/SOs, in their policy-management role</div><div><br></div><div>- it reduces the need for excruciating detail in criteria and (correctly, in my view) increases reliance on the judgement and wisdom of the policy-management bodies</div><div><br></div><div>- provides a chance to iteratively arrive at an approach that has broad approval and acceptance in the community.</div><div><br></div><div>the picture is attached. &nbsp;any thoughts? &nbsp;slashing criticism ("Mikey you're crazy") is fine!</div><div><br></div><div>mikey</div><div><br></div><div></div></body></html>

Attachment: Policy vs Implementation.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><br><div apple-content-edited="true">
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; display: inline !important; float: none; ">PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: <a href="http://www.haven2.com";>www.haven2.com</a>, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)</span>

</div>
<br></div></body></html>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>