Re: [ispcp] [ispcp] FW: [council] Current draft of Fadi's requested communication from council
as do i. mikey On Feb 14, 2013, at 6:32 AM, Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > I do as well. > > Wolf-Ulrich > > -----Original Message----- > Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:22:28 +0100 > Subject: RE: [ispcp] FW: [council] Current draft of Fadi's requested > communication from council > From: "Novoa, Osvaldo" <onovoa@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "'Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>, > "ispcp@xxxxxxxxx" <ispcp@xxxxxxxxx> > > I, personally, support sending this letter as written. > Best regards, > Osvaldo > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] En > nombre de Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx > Enviado el: Jueves, 14 de Febrero de 2013 10:10 > Para: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx > Asunto: [ispcp] FW: [council] Current draft of Fadi's requested > communication from council > > I'd like to put a short discussion about the letter annexed to the > agenda today. > > Clearly BC and IPC are against sending this letter. There shall be a > last try to find a conclusion about. Fadi's deadline is end of Feb. > > We should settle our position. > > Regards > > Wolf-Ulrich > > -----Original Message----- > Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:00:47 +0100 > Subject: [council] Current draft of Fadi's requested communication from > council > From: Mason Cole <mcole@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx List" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Council colleagues -- > > As you know, Fadi requested of the council its input regarding the > strawman proposal resulting from the BC's and IPC's request for > additional RPMs in new gTLDs. On December 27, I circulated an early > draft of a council reply. > > The communication is due very shortly, and has been taken up by a small > group within the council to ensure that all points of view are > represented. Because this is an agenda item for our meeting this week, > at Maria Farrell's helpful suggestion, I'm sending the current draft to > council so we can be prepared to discuss it then. This draft does not > reflect additional input of the BC and IPC -- if this is provided prior > to the meeting, I'll be happy to forward it to the council. > > Thanks -- > > Mason > > > > El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido > únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede > ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor > notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine > inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su > sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este > e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas > destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con > respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo > nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información > > > This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely > for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform > the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as > the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any > person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. > ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without > respecting our Information Security Policy. > > > PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) Attachment:
smime.p7s
|