<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ispcp] FW: Re: [council] GNSO ATRT2 Applicants (minor change to improve clarity)
- To: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [ispcp] FW: Re: [council] GNSO ATRT2 Applicants (minor change to improve clarity)
- From: "Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx" <Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 13:34:36 +0100
- List-id: ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Reply-to: "Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx" <Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
All,
this in effect means that at least in the CPH there shall not be
achieved the 60% threshold necessary to support the additional
candidates. I'm sorry, Olivier, that this happens. I'm sure the
Registrars would have supported if the CPH had at least one non-US
candidate.
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
-----Original Message-----
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 10:19:42 +0100
Subject: Re: [council] GNSO ATRT2 Applicants (minor change to improve
clarity)
From: Volker Greimann <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Jonathan Robinson <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Dear Jonathan,
thank you for making sure the process remains on track despite
the difficult deadlines and our inablility to resolve this early
on our last call. During the Amsterdam meeting the RrSG
councilors have met and discussed the ballot, and we have
elected to abstain on a vote on the two additional candidates.
We believe the GNSO has endorsed four candidates for the ATRT
that are highly capable for the role. The questions of
geographic and gender diversity are fully available to the
Chairs of the Board and GAC through the full slate of candidates
from all parts of the community.
Best regards,
Volker Greimann
All,
The GNSO Council has now received endorsements from all
four SGs.
As a reminder, the GNSO process is as follows:
The Council will consider the resulting list of up to
four nominees at its next teleconference. If the list does
not meet the above mentioned diversity objectives, the
Council as a whole may choose to endorse up to two
additional candidates from the applicant pool who would
help to give the list of GNSO nominees the desired
balance. In this case, the Council would hold a vote
during its teleconference, with sixty percent support of
both
houses represented in the Council being required for
endorsement. If no candidate obtains that level of
support, the list of endorsements obtained via the
bottom-up process of stakeholder group nominations will be
deemed final and forwarded to ICANN.
Please note:
· The candidate list meets the GNSO agreed gender
diversity requirements in that not all endorsed candidates
are of the same gender.
· However it does not meet the GNSO agreed
geographic diversity requirements in that all endorsed
candidates are from a single (North America) ICANN region.
Therefore the slate needs to be added to with (up to two)
additional SG supported candidates in order to get closer
to meeting geographic diversity requirements.
The two SG supported candidates that assist us in meeting
this requirement are:
Marie-Laure Lemineur
F
Latin America
NCSG
Olivier Mouron
M
Europe
CSG
Therefore we will ballot the Council on list (since a
teleconference is now not practical ahead of the deadline)
in order to see if either or both (of Marie-Laure
Lemineur and Olivier Mouron)
have the support of 60% of both houses of the Council.
PLEASE CAN YOU KEEP AN ALERT VIEW ON THE COUNCIL LIST
FOR THE BALLOT WHICH WILL BE AVAILABLE NO LATER THAN
23H59 UTC TODAY (24TH JANUARY 2013). THE BALLOT WILL
CLOSE 23H59 UTC ON 26TH JANUARY.
Thank-you.
Jonathan
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|