<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ispcp] WG: GNSO Council Resolutions 20 December 2012
- To: <ispcp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ispcp] WG: GNSO Council Resolutions 20 December 2012
- From: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 18:38:51 +0100
- Accept-language: de-DE
- Acceptlanguage: de-DE
- List-id: ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Ac3e5tJKaHkuwEeMRBC61F6wTSzrFQEqPN2Q
- Thread-topic: GNSO Council Resolutions 20 December 2012
FYI
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Glen de Saint Géry
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. Dezember 2012 20:19
An: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: [council] GNSO Council Resolutions 20 December 2012
Dear Councillors,
Ahead of the official minutes please find the two resolution passed by the GNSO Council at its meeting on 20 December 2012.
1 Motion to recommend protections in the first round of new gTLDs for certain Red Cross / Red Crescent (RCRC) and International Olympic Committee (IOC) names:
=============================================================================================================================
WHEREAS:
The Board Resolution 2011.06.20.01, authorized "the President and CEO to implement the new gTLD program which includes . . . incorporation of text concerning protection for specific
requested Red Cross and IOC names for the top level only during the initial application round, until the GNSO and GAC develop policy advice based on the global public interest, . ."
(http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-20jun11-en.htm)
The IOC/RC Drafting Team established 1 November 2011 by the GNSO Council has considered a number of different options with respect to protections of both the IOC and the RCRC terms in response to the GAC proposal to provide permanent protection for such terms including at the second level in new gTLDs;
The solution proposed by the IOC/RC Drafting Team, to initiate a PDP and to provide temporary reservation of the exact match IOC/RC names, was posted for public comment on
28 September 2012 and closed on 9 November 2012;
The GNSO has now (17 October 2012) initiated a policy development process (PDP) to evaluate possible protections for certain international organization names in all gTLDs,
including, specifically, whether to recommend policies to protect IOC/RCRC names; and
Therefore, the IOC/RC Drafting Team recommends that the GNSO Council recommend to the Board that it adopt the second recommendation of the IOC/RC Drafting Team, providing
for temporary reservation of the exact match IOC/RC names, prior to the delegation of the first round of new gTLDs.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That the GNSO Council adopts the IOC/RC Drafting Team's recommendation to temporarily reserve the exact match of IOC and RCRC second level domain names listed in
Section 2.2.1.2.3 of the Applicant Guidebook and per the GAC recommendation of 14 September 2011 pending the outcome of the recently launched policy development process
involving International Governmental and Non-governmental Organizations.
That the GNSO Council thanks the members of the IOC/RC Drafting Team for their efforts in producing these recommendations, and hereby disbands the IOC/RC Drafting Team; and
That the Chair of the GNSO Council is authorized to forward these recommendations to the ICANN Board.
2. Motion on the Adoption of a Working Group on Consumer Trust, Consumer Choice, and Competition (CTCCC)
=====================================================================================
Whereas, on 10 December 2010, the ICANN Board adopted Resolution 30 (http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-10dec10-en.htm) requesting advice from the GNSO, ccNSO, ALAC and GAC on establishing the definition, measures, and three-year targets for those measures, for competition, consumer trust and consumer choice in the context of the domain name system (DNS), such advice to be provided for discussion at the ICANN International Public meeting in San Francisco from 13-18 March 2011;
Whereas, the GNSO Council approved the Charter
(http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/cci-charter-07sep11-en.pdf) for a Consumer Choice, Trust, and Competition Working Group (CTCCCWG) to produce an Advice Letter for consideration by Supporting Organizations(SOs) and Advisory Committees (ACs) to assist them in responding to the Board request for establishing the definition, measures, and three-year targets for those measures, for competition, consumer trust and consumer choice in the context of the domain name system;
Whereas, the CCI WG created a draft Advice Letter and posted it for Public Comment (http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/cctc-draft-advice-letter-23feb12-en.htm);
Whereas, the CCI WG reviewed all Public Comments and feedback from public sessions and produced a Final Advice Letter
(http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/cctc/cctc-final-advice-letter-05dec12-en.pdf) for consideration by the SOs and ACs.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT:
RESOLVED, the GNSO Council endorses these recommendations for establishing the definition, measures and three-year targets for those measures for competition, consumer trust and consumer choice in the context of the domain name system as described in the Final Advice Letter.
RESOLVED FURTHER, the GNSO Council approves the delivery of the Final Advice Letter to the ICANN Board.
RESOLVED FURTHER, the GNSO Council thanks the CTCCC WG members for their diligence and persistent efforts on this important topic and disbands the Working Group.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Glen
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|