ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ispcp]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ispcp] Impact of new gTLD program

  • To: tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [ispcp] Impact of new gTLD program
  • From: MAEMURA Akinori <maem@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 03:23:30 +0900
  • In-reply-to: <006401cd964d$5bb8ac50$132a04f0$@btinternet.com>
  • List-id: ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <006401cd964d$5bb8ac50$132a04f0$@btinternet.com>
  • Sender: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Tony,

Thank you for your kind response.
Maybe I need to know more context to think this, and Toronto would be the nice place for it.

Akinori

In message <006401cd964d$5bb8ac50$132a04f0$@btinternet.com>
   "[ispcp] Impact of new gTLD program"
   ""tony holmes" <tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" wrote:

| 
| 
| All 
| 
| Many thanks for your quick response on the draft. The attached version
| should contain all proposed changes. Please let me know promptly if I've
| missed anything, I intend to send the final version to ICANN today.
| 
|  
| 
| Akinori - in answer to the issue you raised; if the proposed Stakeholder
| Advisory Platform remained within the GNSO it wouldn't solve the problem as
| each group would still discuss common issues within their own domain before
| broader discussion occurred. Neither would that reduce the load on the
| existing policy development groups. I hope that answers your question.
| 
|  
| 
| Regards
| 
|  
| 
| Tony
| 
| 
| 
| 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>