ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ispcp]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ispcp] JAS WG Report

  • To: jaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [ispcp] JAS WG Report
  • From: maruyama@xxxxxxxxx (MARUYAMA Naomasa)
  • Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 02:52:56 +0900 (JST)
  • Cc: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
  • In-reply-to: <014201cc9184$a6dd66e0$f49834a0$@com.br> (jaime@powerself.com.br)
  • List-id: ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: maruyama@xxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

>From: "Jaime Wagner - PowerSelf" <jaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 11:06:56 -0200

>Although there may exist controversial points in the JAS WG Report, I think
>that the lowering of the application fee for needy applicants is something
>that we could support and I would like to state that on the Council.

Povided that there are enough safeguard against exploiting the system.
Are there enough safeguard?  I haven't read the report in detail so
I dotn't know.

Masa.

----
(Mr.) NaoMASA Maruyama
Japan Network Information Center(JPNIC)



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>