[ispcp] WG: [council] Re: Letter to GAC and ccNSO re Consumer metrics
All, Prior to the ISPCP call on my schedule today - I'm hopefully correct - I'd like to give you notice of a draft letter potentially to be sent to GAC and ccNSO and Stéphane's related comment. I'd appreciate your opinion on that during the call in order to forward an ISPCP opinion to the council chair. Hear you soon. Kind regards Wolf-Ulrich -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Stéphane Van Gelder Gesendet: Montag, 1. August 2011 10:43 An: Rosemary Sinclair Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO Betreff: [council] Re: Letter to GAC and ccNSO re Consumer metrics Hi Rosemary, Thanks for your request. I am copying the Council on my response because I think this is a discussion we should all be having. Let me start by saying how much I appreciate your efforts as leader of the GNSO Council's Consumer metrics initiative. I'm sure all Councillors feel the same way. What I am not sure of, however, is that all would feel comfortable with me sending the letter you have drafted as-is. My understanding is that we as a Council have yet to determine whether we are comfortable with moving this ahead as a cross-community effort. My own personal view is that the letter as drafted could be misconstrued as a call for cross-community work. I am not saying whether this is a good or bad thing, but as there has been considerable debate on this over the past few months, I would not feel comfortable in sending such a letter in my capacity as Chair unless I know the Council supports that move. So may I ask for comments on the proposed letter? Is everyone OK with me sending it as-is? Thanks. Stéphane Attachment:
Request to GAC_ccNSO.docx Le 31 juil. 2011 à 00:15, Rosemary Sinclair a écrit : > Hi Stephane > > I wonder if you would review this letter for GAC and ccNSO if you are happy to send it as GNSO Council Chair > > The topic of extended participation in our discussions came up at our audio-conference on Wednesday > > The group appreciates that the Motion still has to be approved by Council but there is interest in the work continuing on an informal basis in the meantime > > but a strong view that the concepts are complicated and inter-related > > so the more diverse views the better, the earlier the better..... > > the letter will need Glen's attention to ensure ICANN protocols and details are correct - I am completely out of my depth on all that!!!! > > cheers > > Rosemary > ________________________________________ > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Glen de Saint Géry [Glen@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 8:32 AM > To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [council] Draft Council meeting minutes 21 July 2011. > > Dear Councillors, > > Attached please find the draft minutes of the Council meeting held on 21 July 2011. > > If there are no comments, these minutes will be published on the website as approved on 8 August 2011. > > Thank you. > > Kind regards, > Glen > > > Glen de Saint Géry > GNSO Secretariat > gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > http://gnso.icann.org > > > <Request to GAC:ccNSO.docx> |