RE: [ispcp] RE: Constituency input to Board/GAC consultations

["Tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

All

Adding a brief line to include Jill's comment would seem to be a useful
addition. Otherwise this appears complete.

Thanks to all who contributed.

Tony

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of jillian.mertsch@xxxxxx
Sent: 16 March 2011 01:20
To: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx; ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ispcp] RE: Constituency input to Board/GAC consultations


Elegantly done.  I don't have any major changes to offer.  However, is it
worth adding a line calling for the whole process to be concluded as quickly
an efficiently as possible?

Best,
Jillian (Cocayne) Mertsch
VP, US Government Affairs
BT
Mobile: +1 202 281 4334
________________________________________
From: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx [KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 9:03 PM
To: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ispcp] Constituency input to Board/GAC consultations

All,

Following the ISPCP constituency meeting see attached a draft comment to be
delivered tomorrow morning to the public Board session on the applicant
guide book.

Please provide any comments/amendments you may find useful.
Deadline: WEDNESDAY, 08:00 a.m.
<<ISPCP comment.doc>>


Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich