[ispcp] ENC: [council] GNSO Council motions for Wednesday 8 December

["Jaime Wagner - PowerSelf" <jaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

fyi

 

Jaime Wagner

jaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Direto (51) 3219-5955  Cel (51) 8126-0916

Geral  (51) 3233-3551  DDG: 0800-703-6366

 <http://www.powerself.com.br/> www.powerself.com.br

 

De: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Em
nome de Glen de Saint Géry
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 8 de dezembro de 2010 21:46
Para: GNSO Council
Assunto: [council] GNSO Council motions for Wednesday 8 December

 

Dear All,

 

The following motions were passed by the GNSO Council at its meeting in
Cartagena on Thursday 8 December 2010.


Thank you very much.

Kind regards,

 

Glen

 

1. Motion to Terminate The Policy Development Process on Vertical
Integration Between Registries and Registrars.

 

Whereas, on 28 January 2010, the GNSO Council approved a policy development
process (PDP) on the topic of vertical integration between registries and
registrars;

 

Whereas, the VI Working Group has published its Interim Report and has
presented it to the GNSO Council on 9 November 2010, describing the results
of the first phase of its deliberations;

Whereas, the Working Group is unable to reach a consensus on any
recommendations for the GNSO Council to consider with regard to vertical
integration and cross-ownership between Registrars and Registries in time
for the first round of new gTLD applications (Phase I);

Whereas, in the absence of guidance from the GNSO Council, the ICANN Board
has voted to allow new gTLD registries to own registrars, and has opted not
to create new rules prohibiting registrars from applying for or operating
new gTLD registries;

With the publication of the Interim Report, the VI Working Group has
suspended its activities pending further instructions from the GNSO Council;
and

Whereas, in light of these recent developments, the GNSO Council desires to
terminate the PDP on Vertical Integration between Registries and Registrars.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT:

 

RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council recognizes that, in light of these recent
developments, there is no longer a need or desire to pursue further policy
development activities with respect to this issue;

 

RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council formally ends the PDP on Vertical
Integration between Registries and Registrars without making any
recommendations for specific policy changes to ICANN?s Board of Directors;

 

RESOLVED FURTHER, that the VI PDP Working Group is hereby disbanded. The
GNSO Council appreciates the hard work and tremendous effort shown by each
member of the VI PDP Working group in producing the Interim Report, and
sincerely thanks the Co-Chairs, Mike O?Connor and Roberto Gaetano, for their
leadership in this PDP.

 

WHEREAS, on 8 September 2010 the GNSO Council endorsed GNSO participation in
a joint working group with other interested Supporting Organizations (SO?s)
and Advisory Committee (AC?s) to provide guidance to the ICANN new gTLD
Implementation Team and the ICANN Board in relation to the implementation of
the Council's Recommendation 6 regarding strings that contravene
generally-accepted legal norms relating to morality and public order that
are recognized under international principles of law;

WHEREAS, the Recommendation 6 cross-community working group (CWG) was
established in accordance with the Terms of Reference also approved by the
GNSO Council on 8 September 2010;

AND WHEREAS, the CWG has since delivered a set of recommendations regarding
implementation of the GNSO Council's Recommendation 6 for new gTLDs to the
community;

RESOLVED, the Council thanks the CWG and its participants, from the GNSO and
other SOs and the ACs, for their hard work; and acknowledges that the CWG
recommendations do not constitute Consensus Policy or GNSO policy
development otherwise within the purview of the GNSO;


RESOLVED FURTHER, the Council recommends that each Stakeholder Group and
Constituency provide feedback as soon as possible on the CWG's
recommendations to the Council.

3.  Proposed motion on recommendations made recently by the cross-community
working group (CWG) regarding implementation of the Council's Recommendation
6 (which formed the basis for the "morality and public order" section of the
draft AGB.)


WHEREAS, on 8 September 2010 the GNSO Council endorsed GNSO participation in
a joint working group with other interested Supporting Organizations (SO?s)
and Advisory Committee (AC?s) to provide guidance to the ICANN new gTLD
Implementation Team and the ICANN Board in relation to the implementation of
the Council's Recommendation 6 regarding strings that contravene
generally-accepted legal norms relating to morality and public order that
are recognized under international principles of law;

WHEREAS, the Recommendation 6 cross-community working group (CWG) was
established in accordance with the Terms of Reference also approved by the
GNSO Council on 8 September 2010;

AND WHEREAS, the CWG has since delivered a set of recommendations regarding
implementation of the GNSO Council's Recommendation 6 for new gTLDs to the
community;

RESOLVED, the Council thanks the CWG and its participants, from the GNSO and
other SOs and the ACs, for their hard work; and acknowledges that the CWG
recommendations do not constitute Consensus Policy or GNSO policy
development otherwise within the purview of the GNSO;


RESOLVED FURTHER, the Council recommends that each Stakeholder Group  and
constituency provide feedback as soon as possible to the Council,  on the
CWG recommendations.

3. MOTION APPROVING THE DRAFT CHARTER OF THE JOINT DNS SECURITY AND
STABILITY ANALYSIS WORKING GROUP (DSSA-WG)

 

WHEREAS, at their meetings during the ICANN Brussels meeting in June 2010
the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC), the Country Code Names Supporting
Organization (ccNSO), the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO), the
Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC), and the Number Resource Organization
(NRO) acknowledged the need for a better understanding of the security and
stability of the global domain name system (DNS);

WHEREAS, this issue is considered to be of common interest to the
participating Supporting Organisations (SOs), Advisory Committees (ACs) and
others, and should be preferably undertaken in a collaborative effort;

WHEREAS, the ALAC, ccNSO, GNSO and NRO agreed to establish a Joint DNS
Security and Stability Analysis Working Group (DSSA-WG), in accordance with
each organization?s own rules and procedures and invite other AC?s to liaise
and engage with the DSSA-WG in a manner they consider to be appropriate;

 

WHEREAS, a Drafting Team of the Chairs of the ccNSO, the ALAC, and the GNSO,
along with interested representatives from those organizations, produced a
Draft Charter and posted it for the review of the participating SOs and ACs
on 15 November 2010 at
http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/dssa-draft-charter-12nov10-en.pdf;

 

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT:

 

RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council approves this Draft Charter and encourages
GNSO constituencies, stakeholder groups, and other GNSO participants to
identify possible participants of the DSSA-WG with demonstrated expertise in
the objectives of the Draft Charter.

 

 

4. Motion to extend the Policy Process Steering Committee (PPSC) and the
Operations Steering Committee (OSC) charters.

Whereas in October 2008, the GNSO Council established a framework for
implementing the various GNSO Improvements identified and approved by the
ICANN Board of Directors (see - GNSO Council Improvements Implementation
Plan)

 <http://www.icann.org/en/topics/gnso-improvements/gnso-improvements>
http://www.icann.org/en/topics/gnso-improvements/gnso-improvementsimplementa
tion-plan-16oct08.pdf;

Whereas that framework included the formation of two Steering Committees the
Operations Steering Committee and the Policy Process Steering Committee - to
charter and coordinate the efforts of five community work teams designed to
develop specific recommendations to implement specific aspects of the
improvements;


Whereas the Council intended the charters of the committees (and their
attendant work teams) to be temporary and not to extend beyond the 2009
annual ICANN meeting without specific action by the Council;

 

Whereas the Council has now twice extended the terms of those committees to
allow the GNSO community implementation recommendations work to continue
(see - 

 <http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/minutes-council-24sep09.htm>
http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/minutes-council-24sep09.htm and 

 <http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/minutes-council-10mar10-en.htm>
http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/minutes-council-10mar10-en.htm);

 

Whereas the Council acknowledges the hard work of those work teams and notes
that those committees and their teams are diligently continuing their work;

 

RESOLVED, The Council extends the terms of the Operations Steering Committee
and the Policy Process Steering Committee and their respective work teams as
necessary through the ICANN public meeting in June 2011.

 

RESOLVED, the Council acknowledges and thanks the OSC, the PPSC and the five
community work teams for their hard work; and directs each steering
committee and applicable work team chair to identify for the Council any
remaining targets and benchmarks for their respective work by no later than
19 January 2011, including expected deadlines for final delivery.

 

RESOLVED FURTHER, a drafting team shall be established no later than 19
January 2011, to draft a charter for a Standing Committee to track and
coordinate implementation of those OSC, PPSC and work team recommendations
already approved by the Council and adopted, as recommended by the
Communications and Coordination Work Team in its final report of 9 April
2010

 

Glen de Saint Géry

GNSO Secretariat

gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

http://gnso.icann.org